Williams Legal Services, PLLC

Estate Planning Attorney For Missouri State

636-698-1331
  • Home
  • About
  • Practice Areas
    • Estate Planning Wills & Trusts
    • Special Needs Trusts
    • Divorce Law
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Book
  • Pay
    • Client Dropbox
  • Toggle Mobile Menu
  • Toggle Search
  • 636-698-1331
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Videos
  • Email

Divorce Law

Overview of Divorce Law in Missouri

Property Division

The court is required to set apart to each spouse his or her separate property and divide the marital property and debts in proportions as the court deems just. Notably, the law does not require an even division of property and debt – what is required is a “just” division. Or in other words, a division that the judge determines is fair under the circumstances.

If you are not able to agree upon the division of assets and debt with your spouse, the judge will be required to make this determination. In doing so, the judge will first make findings on whether assets are marital or separate. Generally, all assets acquired during a marriage are marital, except for property acquired by gift or inheritance, property acquired in exchange for other separate property, property acquired before the marriage, property identified as separate property by a valid written agreement between you and your spouse, and the increase in value of property acquired before marriage. After the Court sets aside each spouse’s separate property, it will then make a just division of the marital property.

In making a just division of marital property, the Court is required to consider the following factors: 1) the economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of property will be effective; 2) the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of marital property; 3) the value of the non-marital property set apart to each spouse; 4) the conduct of the parties during the marriage; and, 5) the custodial arrangements for minor children.

Section 452.330, RSMo.

Child Custody

When there are children involved, the court will need to enter orders relating to child custody. In doing so, the court looks to establish a custody order that promotes frequent and meaningful contact with both parents, and encourages parents to share in the decision-making rights and responsibilities of the children.

Generally, the court has four options in determining custody of children. It may order the parents to share joint legal custody and/or joint physical custody, and may order that one parent receive sole legal custody and/or sole physical custody, with the other parent receiving visitation with the children. The court can order these legal and physical custody designations in any combination it sees fit to best promote the best interests of the children.

Child Support

The court may order either or both parents to pay child support. However, in practice, the court will generally order one parent to pay the other parent. The court can make this support responsibility retroactive to the filing of the petition for divorce.

Child support is initially determined according to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 88.01. This rule sets forth a formula that creates a rebuttable presumption for the child support number it calculates. The formula is intended to provide for child support awards that are consistent statewide and that more adequately reflect the true costs of child rearing. More specifically, the formula considers the financial resources of the parents, financial resources of the child, needs of the custodial parent, physical and emotional condition of the child, and the standard of living the child would have enjoyed had the marriage not been dissolved. However, it should be noted that these guidelines change every four years.

While the number calculated by Civil Procedure Rule 88.01, and Civil Procedure Form 14, are presumed correct, the court may approve a different amount if certain requirements are met.

For additional information related to child support in Missouri, please visit our child support page. 

Maintenance (Spousal Support)

The court may award maintenance upon request of either spouse. In determining whether to award maintenance, the court will determine whether the requesting party lacks sufficient property, including property distributed during the divorce, to provide for his or her reasonable needs, and whether the requesting party is able to meet his reasonable needs through appropriate employment. The court will also consider any custody schedule or special conditions of a child in determining whether the requesting spouse has the ability to gain employment to meet his reasonable needs.

If a part demonstrates that he or she requires maintenance, the court must then determine what amount of maintenance is appropriate. Unlike child support, there is no rigid formula the court follows in making this determination. Instead, the court will consider any relevant factors including the nine specific factors set forth in Missouri’s maintenance statute (452.335, RSMo).

Any award of maintenance will also include a determination of whether the award is modifiable or non-modifiable, and possibly a specific duration for payments.

Temporary Maintenance

Either party to a divorce may move for temporary maintenance. The Court’s analysis is similar, if the not the same, to its analysis for maintenance in the underlying divorce case. However, the purpose of temporary maintenance is to maintain the status quo of the parties pending the final divorce judgment, and the Court is provided broad discretion in this determination.

Section 452.315, RSMo; Dubrovensky v. Vakula, 574 S.W.3d 287 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019)

Standard of Living

Evidence of what the rent and utility payments were in the marital home is direct evidence of the standard of living a couple enjoyed during the marriage.

A spouse will not be penalized for accepting a downgraded living situation during a divorce when seeking maintenance based on standard of living during the marriage.

Dubrovenskiy v. Vakula, 574 S.W.3d 287 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019).

Consideration of Past and Present Earnings

In making a maintenance determination, the Court may consider the past and present earnings of each spouse. In certain situations, such as where a spouse voluntarily reduces his income, the Court will impute income to that spouse based on what he could have earned by use of his best efforts to gain employment suitable to his capabilities.

Faintich v. Faintich, 861 S.W.2d 217 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993).

Please consult an attorney for advice about your individual situation. This site and its information is not legal advice, nor is it intended to be. Feel free to get in touch by electronic mail, letters or phone calls. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Until an attorney-client relationship is established, please withhold from sending any confidential information to us.

Website created just for Law Offices of Drew Lawrence Williams by Personable Media

View our Privacy Policy

Complete this form to send us a message. Everything submitted through this form is confidential and we will reach back out to you promptly.

Contact

    Contacting us does not does not create an attorney-client relationship. Soliciting services through this form is strictly prohibited.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Drew will call you back, shortly.

Pick The Time For Your Call. Schedule Now ⬇️

Drew Williams Professional Background

Drew began focusing on family law during his second semester of law school. He graduated law school with an emphasis on Child and Family Law, obtained membership into the Order of Barristers, and was honored with the Child and Family Services Clinic Outstanding Student Award. After finishing law school, Drew worked as a law clerk in the 16th Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, where he assisted the judge in handling Jackson County’s family law and domestic relations dockets.

In 2016, Drew began working as an associate attorney at Todt, Ryan, Cody, and Fuchs, LLC in St. Charles, Missouri. While there, he gained invaluable experience and mentorship in litigating divorce and family law cases. In 2019, Drew accepted a position as Litigation Attorney with domestic litigation firm Cordell & Cordell in St. Louis, Missouri. During his time at Cordell & Cordell, Drew managed a large case load where he continued to build, hone, and refine his approach to divorce and family law matters.

In 2022, Drew began Williams Legal Services with the goal of creating a platform to provide exceptional representation to clients in family law and estate planning matters.

Professional History

2022: Williams Legal Services

2019-2021: Litigation Attorney, Cordell & Cordell

2016-2019: Associate Attorney, Todt, Ryan, Cody & Fuchs LLC

2015-2016: Law Clerk to the Honorable Bryan E. Round, 16th Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri

Education

Juris Doctorate, University of Missouri – Kansas City School of Law, Class of 2015